theodore M I R A L D I mpa ... editor, publisher, writer. katherine molé mfa ... art director

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Monica Lewinsky Recording Telling Clinton, ‘I Could Take My Clothes Off…’

Secret Sex Tape: Monica Lewinsky Caught On Explicit Recording Telling Bill Clinton, ‘I Could Take My Clothes Off…’

Getty Images/Landov
Getty Images/Landov

By radarstaff

A sex tape that Monica Lewinsky recorded for Bill Clinton at the height of their scandalous affair has leaked, during which the former White House intern is heard planning a secret sexual rendezvous with the president and declaring she is “too cute and adorable” to be ignored.
On the audio tape obtained by The National Enquirer, Lewinsky at one point tries to seduce the commander in chief: “I could take my clothes off and start… well… I know you wouldn’t enjoy that? I hope to see you later and I hope you will follow my script and do what I want.”
Lewinsky, who turned 40 last week, made the three-minute, 47 second recording in November 1997 and addressed it to “handsome.”
Details of the sexually explicit tape are in the new issue of the Enquirer, which hits newsstands Thursday.
It was believed to have been destroyed years ago, but a copy was secretly made and has subsequently surfaced.
Lewinsky is the only voice heard.
On it, she tells the 42nd President: “Since I know you will be alone tomorrow evening, I have two proposals for you, neither of which is you not seeing me.”
Lewinsky then orders the leader of the free world to use his secretary, Betty Currie, as a go-between and plan the presidential schedule so they could covertly meet without a formal record of her visit.
“Now the first thing that has to happen is that you need to pre-plan with Betty that you will leave the office at, I don¹t know, at 7, 7:30 so that everyone else who hates me that causes me lots of trouble goes home,” she tells Clinton.
“Then you quickly sneak back and then in the meantime I quickly sneak over and then we can have a nice little visit for, you know, 15 minutes or half an hour. Whatever you want.”
Lewinsky also bemoans how their previous “60 seconds” encounter “was just not enough ­ even though you did look very handsome.”
“Maybe we could go over and watch a movie together and just have kind of, I don¹t know, boxed dinners or something like that,” she says.
“And then that way we don’t have to deal with the problem of me… of there being a record of me going upstairs and we can spend some time together and see a good movie.
“So I don’t know, those are two proposals and you can’t refuse me because I’m too cute and adorable and soon I won’t be here anymore to pop over.
“I’m hoping you will hear this and you will choose which one you want to do and go tell Betty and then she can call me and let me know so I don¹t have to stress out all day and I don¹t have to call her every two hours and bug her because, I know you will find this very hard to believe, but I can be a pain in the ass sometimes.
“I’m very persistent, but um… I really want to see you.”
According to The Enquirer, Lewinsky originally played the tape for Linda Tripp — the woman whose secret telephone tapes of Lewinsky ultimately led to Clinton’s impeachment — on Nov. 20, 1997.
The cassette was delivered to the Oval Office the next day, according to a report by the Office of Independent Counsel Ken Starr.
The tape and other racy mementoes, including love letters Lewinsky wrote to Clinton, were obtained by an individual who was hired as a “cleaner” by individuals close to Lewinsky.
The source kept the sensational material private for the past 15 years and the Clintons reportedly thought the evidence had been destroyed.
“First, I forgot to tell you that the Gingko Blowjoba, or whatever it’s called, was from me,” Lewinsky wrote in one romantic note to Clinton.
“I also included those new Zinc throat lozenges which are rumored to be great.”
In a series of pleading notes, a clearly distraught Lewinsky pestered Clinton to make time for her and begged him to explain why he ended their illicit romance.
The Enquirer reports the emergence of the tape could torpedo Hillary’s expected run for the White House.
“The Clintons thought this sex tape was dead and buried,” said one source. “If this tape and other material are surfacing now, imagine what else must be out there?
“This could be just the tip of theiceberg and the most embarrassing ‘bimbo eruption’ of all for the Clintons.”


GOP Report: Holder Misled Congress

Republican report concludes Holder misled Congress on reporter targeting

July 25, 2013: Attorney General Eric Holder speaks at the National Urban League annual conference. (AP)

House Republicans, in a lengthy report on the Justice Department's leak investigations, formally accused Attorney General Eric Holder of misleading Congress with "deceptive" testimony that he knew nothing of the "potential prosecution" of the press. 

The 70-page report was released late Wednesday by Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee. To coincide with the release, lawmakers also wrote a letter to President Obama calling for a "change in leadership" at the Justice Department. 
"The deceptive and misleading testimony of Attorney General Holder is unfortunately just the most recent example in a long list of scandals that have plagued the department," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said in a statement. 
The report delved into the department's aggressive investigations over various security leaks, but focused in large part on the FBI affidavit seeking a search warrant for Fox News correspondent James Rosen's emails in connection with one such probe. The DOJ sought access to the documents by arguing Rosen was a likely criminal "co-conspirator" in a leak case, citing the Espionage Act. 
Yet on May 15, shortly before the document was made public, Holder told the House Judiciary Committee that he hadn't heard of any effort to prosecute reporters. 
"With regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy," Holder said. He discussed the issue amid concerns about the DOJ grabbing phone records from Associated Press offices. 
The newly released House report concluded that this comment was "deceptive and misleading." 
The report said: "We believe that Mr. Holder's simple and direct statement had the intended effect -- to leave the members of the Committee with the impression that not only had the potential prosecution of a reporter never been contemplated during Mr. Holder's tenure, but that nothing comparable to the Rosen search warrant had ever been executed by this administration. ... On the basis of Mr. Holder's testimony, there was little doubt in the Members' minds that the legal machinery for such an undertaking had never been started." 
Justice spokesman Brian Fallon on Wednesday said the latest report "was produced on a purely partisan basis" and said its findings "are contrary to the record and strongly disputed by many of the committee's own members." 
The Justice Department has previously explained that the investigation involving Rosen never escalated into any prosecution of the reporter. The department has acknowledged Holder had approved of the application for the search warrant, but claims his testimony before Congress was nevertheless accurate. 
The report dismissed that explanation. "We take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010," the report said. "Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom." 
The Justice Department has since completed a review of its policies for investigations involving journalists, and has called for a number of reforms. The House GOP report praised some of these efforts. But it also questioned one particular recommendation that the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 be changed so that a journalist can be targeted only when they are the focus of a criminal probe for conduct beyond normal news-gathering. 
The report claimed, though, that this was already the intent of the law. 
"Mr. Holder attempted to disguise his clearly erroneous reading of the statute as a defect in the law," the report said. "Rather than admit that he gave deceptive testimony, and that Mr. Rosen was actually a target of prosecution (and further raise the ire of the media), Mr. Holder instead represented that Mr. Rosen was never a true suspect." 
This explanation, the report claimed, served "only to provide cover for Mr. Holder's misleading testimony." 
But a department spokesman said the department has already revised its own guidelines, urging Congress to do its part. 
"Providing additional safeguards for journalists will require action by Congress. If the report's authors genuinely wish to further protect journalists, they should work to pass the bipartisan media shield legislation that the Department has already endorsed," the spokesman said. 

Read more:

T. Boone Pickens says US must rely on its own resources

T. Boone Pickens says US needs an energy plan, must rely on its own resources

Michael Bastasch

Natural gas mogul T. Boone Pickens says America needs an energy plan, something that will only occur if voters become more educated about the issue.
In advance of a Young America’s Foundation debate at George Washington University that pits Pickens against free-market economist and writer Steve Moore, the Texas billionaire outlined some of his ideas for The Daily Caller News Foundation.
“There is no energy plan for America,” he said. “The debate questions is that we in America do not understand the resources that we have available to us – we do not understand energy. When gasoline prices go up, Bill O’Reilly says it is Exxon that is the cause of it — that is not the case. We need to educate ourselves more about energy because it is such a huge factor in the everyday life of Americans.”
“As it unfolds you say to yourself that we thought we were so dependent on Middle Eastern oil. But then you find out that is not the case,” Pickens added. “I do not think that is generally understood in America.”
So what is Pickens’ energy plan?
“I think it starts off as, let’s get on our own resources,” Pickens said, laying out his plan. “Any country on its own resources is doing well. You could cut the trade deficit by 25 to 30 percent by just taking out OPEC oil. You don’t need it.”
“Show a little leadership in Washington,” he added. “Put together North American Energy Alliance. You have sat here and protected a cartel, OPEC, for the last forty years and you could put together an energy alliance of friendly nations and never have to take a barrel of OPEC oil.”
Pickens’ energy views are somewhat controversial among conservatives and libertarians. He champions domestic energy production, but has been criticized for wanting energy subsidies, in particular for natural gas.
“I have not asked for subsidies for natural gas,” Pickens said. “What I asked for, the difference in the cost of the natural gas engine and the diesel engine was about $30,000 and I said, give a tax credit for the $30,000 with a pay-for and the pay-for would be user pay.”
“I’ve got [Sen. John McCain] saying ‘you are trying to make me pick winners,’” Pickens said. “Okay, we’ve got heavy duty trucks, that is what I am after, you’ve got two fuels that will move it — diesel and natural gas… So he says, you are trying to pick winners. You are trying to make me pick natural gas. Okay, so don’t pick natural gas, what do you get? You get OPEC oil. So you have picked a winner by not picking your own fuel.”
The so-called Pickens Plan never received congressional approval, but Pickens said he didn’t lose any sleep over it because the natural gas boom is moving things in his direction anyway.
“You are moving heavy duty trucking to natural gas now because it is two dollars a gallon cheaper — it is half the cost of diesel,” he said.

Read more:

The Left’s Central Delusion

Its devotion to central planning has endured from the French Revolution to Obamacare.

By Thomas Sowell

The fundamental problem of the political Left seems to be that the real world does not fit their preconceptions. Therefore they see the real world as what is wrong, and what needs to be changed, since apparently their preconceptions cannot be wrong.
A never-ending source of grievances for the Left is the fact that some groups are “over-represented” in desirable occupations, institutions, and income brackets, while other groups are “under-represented.”

From all the indignation and outrage about this expressed on the left, you might think that it was impossible that different groups are simply better at different things.
Yet runners from Kenya continue to win a disproportionate share of marathons in the United States, and children whose parents or grandparents came from India have won most of the American spelling bees in the past 15 years. And has anyone failed to notice that the leading professional basketball players have for years been black, in a country where most of the population is white?
Most of the leading photographic lenses in the world have — for generations — been designed by people who were either Japanese or German. Most of the leading diamond-cutters in the world have been either India’s Jains or Jews from Israel or elsewhere.
Not only people but things have been grossly unequal. More than two-thirds of all the tornadoes in the entire world occur in the middle of the United States. Asia has more than 70 mountain peaks that are higher than 20,000 feet and Africa has none. Is it news that a disproportionate share of all the oil in the world is in the Middle East?
Whole books could be filled with the unequal behavior or performances of people, or the unequal geographic settings in which whole races, nations, and civilizations have developed. Yet the preconceptions of the political Left march on undaunted, loudly proclaiming sinister reasons why outcomes are not equal within nations or between nations.
All this moral melodrama has served as a background for the political agenda of the Left, which has claimed to be able to lift the poor out of poverty, and in general make the world a better place. This claim has been made for centuries and in countries around the world. And it has failed for centuries in countries around the world.
Some of the most sweeping and spectacular rhetoric of the Left occurred in 18th-century France, where the very concept of the Left originated in the fact that people with certain views sat on the left side of the National Assembly.
The French Revolution was their chance to show what they could do when they got the power they sought. In contrast to what they promised — “liberty, equality, fraternity” — what they actually produced were food shortages, mob violence, and dictatorial powers that included arbitrary executions, extending even to their own leaders, such as Robespierre, who died under the guillotine.
In the 20th century, the most sweeping vision of the Left — Communism — spread over vast regions of the world and encompassed well over a billion human beings. Of these, millions died of starvation in the Soviet Union under Stalin and tens of millions in China under Mao.
Milder versions of socialism, with central planning of national economies, took root in India and in various European democracies.
If the preconceptions of the Left were correct, central planning by educated elites who had vast amounts of statistical data at their fingertips and expertise readily available, and were backed by the power of government, should have been more successful than market economies where millions of individuals pursued their own individual interests willy-nilly.
But, by the end of the 20th century, even socialist and communist governments began abandoning central planning and allowing more market competition. Yet this quiet capitulation to inescapable realities did not end the noisy claims of the Left.
In the United States, those claims and policies have reached new heights, epitomized by government takeovers of whole sectors of the economy and unprecedented intrusions into the lives of Americans, of which Obamacare has been only the most obvious example.

Devious election plot bypasses Constitution

Strategy takes 36 states out of voting decision

Aaron Klein

The National Popular Vote effort, which could see only 14 states – those with the largest populations – decide the presidency for voters in all 50 states, is fully partnered with a George Soros-funded election group.
The group, the Center for Voting and Democracy, received original seed money in 1997 from the Joyce Foundation, a non-profit that boasted President Obama served on its board at the time of the grant. Obama was a board member from July 1994 until December 2002.
The National Popular Vote, or NPV, is run by individuals with a history of support for the Democratic Party, WND found.
Last week, the Washington Post reported NPV is “now halfway to its goal of electing future presidents via the popular vote, after Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee (D) made his state the latest to sign on.”
The Post story described NPV as a campaign seeking to “get states that comprise a majority of the 538 votes in the Electoral College –270, to be precise – to agree to award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote.”
The states will not be required to award their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner until NPV has signed up enough states to garner 270 electoral votes.
The Founding Fathers firmly rejected a purely popular vote to elect the president because they wanted to balance the power of the larger states against the smaller.
The Electoral College was fashioned as a compromise between an election of the president by direct popular vote and election by Congress.
Now the NPV effort could change the way Americans vote without amending the U.S. Constitution. The plan simply requires that enough states sign up by voting in their own legislatures and then having their governors approve.
It takes two-thirds of both the House and Senate to pass a constitutional amendment to repeal the Electoral College.
To bypass the constitutional amendment process, NPV minimizes the number of states that would need to agree. Instead, once enough states agree to allot their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner, the Electoral College becomes irrelevant.
With the addition of Rhode Island to the NPV effort, the pact now has nine states plus the District of Columbia for a total of 136 of the 270 electoral votes needed. The other states signed up are Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Washington, Vermont and California.
NPV is partnered with FairVote, a project of the Soros-funded Center for Voting and Democracy.
FairVote’s website expounds on its relationship with NVP:
FairVote advocates for a national popular vote for president, and has nurtured and supported the National Popular Vote plan to ensure that every vote for president is equally valued no matter where it is cast.
FairVote’s executive director Rob Richie co-authored Every Vote Equal, a book explaining how the National Popular Vote plan would work and why the United States desperately needs it, and Fairvote regularly works with advocacy leaders at the National Popular Vote organization to assist in getting to important legislation passed.
Richie, executive director of FairVote since he co-founded it in 1992, is also a member of the civil society committee of the Soros-led Bretton Woods Committee, which openly seeks to remake the world economy.
Richie’s book “Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote” was co-authored with the NPV’s founder, John R. Koza.
In a Dec. 15, 2008, Wall Street Journal opinion piece, Jonathan Soros, son of George Soros, wrote that it was time to junk the Electoral College.
Soros’s Open Society Institute funds the Center for Voting and Democracy, where FairVote is based.
The center’s website notes the group was kick-started in 1997 with two grants – one from the Open Society and another from the Joyce Foundation.
With Obama on its board, the Joyce Foundation also funded the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; the AFL-CIO Working for America Institute; the National Council of La Raza and Physicians for Social Responsibility, among numerous other radical groups.
Meanwhile, the NPV leadership is comprised of Democratic Party supporters.
The organization’s chairman and major funder is John R. Koza. He was the co-founder, chairman and CEO of Scientific Games Inc., where he co-invented the rub-off instant lottery ticket used by state lotteries.
Koza, who has reportedly pledged $12 million to NPV, previously gave tens of thousands of dollars to various Democratic Party committees and liberal candidates and was an Al Gore elector in 2000, the Weekly Standard reported.
Another pledged NPV leader is Tom Golisano, founder and chairman of Paychex, the nation’s second largest payroll and human resource company. He co-founded the Independence Party of New York in 1994 and ran as the party’s gubernatorial candidate.
Golisano is a registered Republican, even though he supported John Kerry and gave $1 million to the Democratic National Convention in 2008.
NPV’s secretary, Chris Pearson, served in the Vermont House of Representatives in 2006. In 2005, he was director of the Presidential Election Reform program at the Soros-funded FairVote.
With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott


Black self-sabotage

A 'conversation' with whites isn't going to stop urban murders

Walter Williams

If we put ourselves into the shoes of racists who seek to sabotage black upward mobility, we couldn’t develop a more effective agenda than that followed by civil rights organizations, black politicians, academics, liberals and the news media. Let’s look at it.
First, weaken the black family, but don’t blame it on individual choices. You have to preach that today’s weak black family is a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow and racism. The truth is that black female-headed households were just 18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today. In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites. Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden for blacks, most black children lived in biological two-parent families. In New York City, in 1925, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households. A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were two-parent households.
During the 1960s, devastating nonsense emerged, exemplified by a Johns Hopkins University sociology professor who argued, “It has yet to be shown that the absence of a father was directly responsible for any of the supposed deficiencies of broken homes.” The real issue, he went on to say, “is not the lack of male presence but the lack of male income.” That suggests marriage and fatherhood can be replaced by a welfare check.
The poverty rate among blacks is 36 percent. Most black poverty is found in female-headed households. The poverty rate among black married couples has been in single digits since 1994 and is about 8 percent today. The black illegitimacy rate is 75 percent, and in some cities, it’s 90 percent. But if that’s a legacy of slavery, it must have skipped several generations, because in the 1940s, unwed births hovered around 14 percent.
Along with the decline of the black family comes anti-social behavior, manifested by high crime rates. Each year, roughly 7,000 blacks are murdered. Ninety-four percent of the time, the murderer is another black person. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, between 1976 and 2011, there were 279,384 black murder victims. Using the 94 percent figure means that 262,621 were murdered by other blacks. Though blacks are 13 percent of the nation’s population, they account for more than 50 percent of homicide victims. Nationally, the black homicide victimization rate is six times that of whites, and in some cities, it’s 22 times that of whites. I’d like for the president, the civil rights establishment, white liberals and the news media, who spent massive resources protesting the George Zimmerman trial’s verdict, to tell the nation whether they believe that the major murder problem blacks face is murder by whites. There are no such protests against the thousands of black murders.
There’s an organization called NeighborhoodScout. Using 2011 population data from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2011 crime statistics from the FBI and information from 17,000 local law enforcement agencies in the country, it came up with a report titled “Top 25 Most Dangerous Neighborhoods in America.” They include neighborhoods in Detroit, Chicago, Houston, St. Louis and other major cities. What’s common to all 25 neighborhoods is that their makeup is described as “Black” or “Mostly Black.” The high crime rates have several outcomes that are not in the best interests of the overwhelmingly law-abiding people in these neighborhoods. There can’t be much economic development. Property has a lower value, but worst of all, people can’t live with the kind of personal security most Americans enjoy.
Disgustingly, black politicians, civil rights leaders, liberals and the president are talking nonsense about “having a conversation about race.” That’s beyond useless. Tell me how a conversation with white people is going to stop black predators from preying on blacks. How is such a conversation going to eliminate the 75 percent illegitimacy rate? What will such a conversation do about the breakdown of the black family (though “breakdown” is not the correct word, as the family doesn’t form in the first place)? Only black people can solve our problems.


Obama's 'new' Marxist ploy

Barry Farber tells Soviet story in explaining BHO's economic speeches
A Southern law professor once instructed his class on how to defend Hell in court. “First you admit that the climate is not the most comfortable,” came the advice, “and then you admit your companions are far from the kind of people you’d choose to spend eternity with. Then,” the professor concluded, “you raise your voice, pound on the table and talk about all the good things!”
President Obama has found a new way to foist communism upon the American people that I would like a lot, if I liked communism. Instead of the direct approach he’s used up to now – which translates into, “It’s time we tried what failed in Russia and 36 other countries since 1918!” – Obama speaks about American capitalism like the beloved family horse too tired to plow any more, or the way the CEO who won the power struggle speaks about his fallen rival at the latter’s “resignation” dinner.
It goes something like this (I’m paraphrasing, but not by much): “Once upon a time this American system worked really well. If you worked hard and did your part, you could have a good, secure life and a comfortable retirement. You didn’t even need a high school education in many cases. When you got old enough, you just showed up at the factory and went to work.”
I forget whether Obama mentioned that one breadwinner per family was enough and that Mama could stay home and care for the young. Whether he did or not, things like that definitely “fit” his praise for the American economic system – back then.
What brought this up? My daughter called and wanted details on one of the greatest “freedom” stories to ever fall into my lap. Shortly after World War II a Jewish father in Soviet Estonia gathered his family of four around him and announced, “My friend who works for the Soviet railways told me Stalin has agreed to let the Greeks in Russia return home. He told me, ‘I know what hour and what day those Greeks will gather at the Moscow train station. They will board three passenger cars bound for the free world. I know they will not require papers of any kind up to the departure of the train.
“‘After that, I have no idea. It’s a huge gamble, but if you want, I can admit the four of you into the staging area.’” The father concluded by emphasizing that, if successful, they’d live in freedom. If not, they’d die in Siberia. The vote was four-to-zero in favor of trying.
Everything went smoothly at first. As the train puffed westward with no talk of “papers” and with happy Greeks celebrating their good fortune, the Estonian family began to feel pretty good. Eventually, though, a KGB thug-type, noticing the four Estonians were blonder than the Greeks, accosted the father and said, “Are you Greek?” The terrified father said, “Yes.” The increasingly suspicious KGB agent pressed on. “Are you sure you’re Greek?” “Yes,” gulped the father once more.
Everybody in the drama spoke Russian – the KGB agent, the Estonians and the Greeks. The KGB agent then called one of the real Greeks over and demanded, “Talk to this man – (the Estonian father) – in Greek!”
The Greek said something to the Estonian father in Greek. The father, not understanding a word, said something back to the Greek in Estonian. The Greek smiled and spoke more Greek. The Estonian smiled even more broadly and spoke more Estonian. Then they started joyously jabbering as though they’d been childhood friends who hadn’t seen each other since the fifth grade in Thessaloniki.
They finally fell into each other’s arms amid the cacophony of their Greek-Estonian language cocktail. The KGB thug grunted, stormed into the next car and was never seen again. The Estonian family, along with the Greeks, reached the free world.
Final score: Freedom 4 – Communist enslavement 0.
That still doesn’t quite explain what this has to do with Obama’s new-improved way to make a naïve America open wide to swallow Marxist economics. On the very day my daughter reminded me of my Estonians, Obama let float his revised pitch in a late July series of economic speeches. And that reminded me of why so many Greeks were living in the Soviet Union in the first place.
Before the Nazi attack on the Soviet Union in June of 1941 Stalin was exasperated at the abject failure of the Russian Communists to organize and run an effective limousine service for the Communist big shots. Oh, the cars were there. Drivers were available. The budget was no problem. So why, then, were the Communist bosses of Ulan Bator, Riga, Tashkent and elsewhere staring at their watches and cursing in Mongolian, Latvian, Uzbek, etc. when their limos were three hours late?
Sorry, Comrade. Even Stalin realized that the Communist beehive needed a good capitalist stinger, which is why he invited Greeks to immigrate to the Soviet Union. Greeks (despite their current economic upscuddles) tend to be among the best capitalists in the world.
I’ll bet those Estonians became pretty good capitalists, too!


Dems 'likely to nominate this Republican for prez'

Media powerhouse thinks Hillary out of equation

Joe Kovacs

PALM BEACH, Fla. – The next presidential election is still three years away, but top-rated radio host Rush Limbaugh is already making a bold prediction about who will be the likely nominee for the Democratic Party.
“I think it’s going to be Chris Christie,” Limbaugh said on his national program Tuesday.
“I think the contest in 2016, the Democrat side, is gonna be between Rahm Emanuel and Andrew Cuomo and Chris Christie.”
What makes the prediction especially noteworthy is that Christie, the governor of New Jersey, is at present a Republican, and he would have to switch parties to be nominated by the Democrats.
On June 5, Limbaugh first brought up the possibility of Christie looking to lead the Democratic ticket, saying at the time: “I’m not predicting it officially here, but I will not be surprised, if when 2016 rolls around and Governor Christie is seeking the presidency, I won’t be surprised if he seeks the Democrat Party nomination.”
“It’s my intelligence guided by experience,” he explained, noting Christie’s decision to have a special election for the Senate seat left open by the death of Sen. Frank Lautenberg could be a telling factor.
Last month, the Star-Ledger of New Jersey reported Christie was “cashing in donations from top Democratic fundraisers and other traditionally liberal donors across the country, even nabbing the support of a handful of rainmakers aligned with President Obama and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.”
“While I do not agree with his stance on every issue, he is one of the best political leaders I have talked to in a long time,” Ken Rosen, a UC-Berkeley professor who cut a $3,800 check to Christie after chatting with him at two events, told the paper. “He is willing to take on tough issues such as pension reform, education reform, mental-health issues, even if his views are not politically correct.”
Meanwhile, a Gallup poll in June found Christie was actually given a higher net favorable rating among Democrats than among Republicans.
Christie “is more liked than disliked by Democrats,” Gallup stated, explaining he was the only Republican with a net positive image among Democrats when compared to other top GOP figures such as Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Paul Ryan.
While many have speculated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is the likely choice to head the Democrats’ presidential ticket in 2016, Limbaugh disagrees.
“I don’t think it’s gonna be Hillary,” Limbaugh stressed.
“I’ve never thought that, because I’ve always said she’s not this brainiac that her conventional wisdom says. She messed up so much that the Clinton administration gave her. Health care, the bimbo eruptions [during the Monica Lewinsky scandal]. She’s not the smartest woman in the world. I have never drank that Kool-Aid on Hillary. I did not think she was gonna be the nominee in 2008, and I didn’t think she was gonna be elected president and I was a lone wolf saying so. It was I who did Operation Chaos to keep her candidacy alive in 2008.”


Newspaper spanks Obama: 'Shove it, Mr. President'

Editors scorch 'umpteenth different' jobs plan


Bob Unruh

A newspaper editorial today greeted Barack Obama in an entirely new way as he traveled to Chattanooga, Tenn., to visit an business center and lobby for his newest strategy to try to create jobs for Americans.
“Take your jobs plan and shove it, Mr. President: Your policies have harmed Chattanooga enough,” said a commentary in the Chattanooga Times Free Press.
“Forgive us if you are not greeted with the same level of Southern hospitality that our area usually bestows on its distinguished guests. You see, we understand you are in town to share your umpteenth different job creation plan during your time in office. If it works as well as your other job creation programs, then thanks, but no thanks. We’d prefer you keep it to yourself,” the newspaper said.
“That’s because your jobs creation plans so far have included a ridiculous government spending spree and punitive tax increase on job creators that were passed, as well as a minimum wage increase that, thankfully, was not. Economists – and regular folks with a basic understanding of math – understand that these are three of the most damaging policies imaginable when a country is mired in unemployment and starving for job growth.”
At Amazon’s Chattanooga fulfillment center, Obama praised the operation for being “kind of like the North Pole of the south right here. … Got a bunch of good-looking elves here.”
He boasted of creating “7.2 million new jobs over the last 40 months” because of the “grit and resilience of the American people.”
“But as I said last week, and as any middle-class family will tell you, we’re not there yet,” Obama said. “Even before the financial crisis hit, we were going through a decade where a few at the top were doing better and better, but most families were working harder and harder just to get by. And reversing that trend should be Washington’s highest priority.”
He said he wanted to lay out his ideas for creating good jobs but lamented that the Republicans in Congress wouldn’t give him everything he asked for.
Obama cited a strategy to offer incentives for manufacturers to keep jobs in the U.S. or bring them back from overseas, spending billions to catch up on “deferred maintenance” in the U.S., creating jobs in wind, solar, and natural gas industries, and exporting more.
He also said he wants corporations to hire more people.
“We’re not lacking for ideas, we’re just lacking action, especially out of Washington,” Obama said.
The newspaper noted “64 percent of Chattanooga respondents said they would rather you hadn’t chosen to visit our fair city,” but the editorial said it actually was good that Obama visited.
“It will give you an opportunity to see the failure of your most comprehensive jobs plan to date, the disastrous stimulus scheme, up close and personal,” the newspaper said.
The commentary cited the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009′s funding of the “Gig to Nowhere.”
That’s a $552 million “socialist-style experiment in government-owned Internet, cable and phone services orchestrated by EPB – Chattanooga’s government-owned electric monopoly.”
“The Gig to Nowhere is a Smart Grid, a high tech local electricity infrastructure intended to improve energy efficiency and reduce power outages. After lobbying for, and receiving, $111.6 million in stimulus money from your administration, EPB decided to build a souped-up version of the Smart Grid with fiber optics rather than more cost-effective wireless technology. This decision was supposed to allow EPB to provide the fastest Internet service in the Western Hemisphere, a gigabit-per-second Internet speed that would send tech companies and web entrepreneurs stampeding to Chattanooga in droves.”
The reality, however, is that the project is “an absolute bust.”
“While the Smart Grid will cost taxpayers and local electric customers well over a half-billion dollars when all is said and done, there has been little improvement in the quality of EPB’s electric service. Worse, despite being heavily subsidized, EPB’s government-owned Internet, cable and telephone outfit that competes head-to-head against private companies like AT&T and Comcast is barely staying afloat, often relying on loans from electric service reserve funds to afford its business expenses,” the newspaper pointed out.
“Further, there has been no credible evidence to suggest that EPB can even provide a gig of service consistently and reliably. Any companies hoping to utilize the Gig to Nowhere are quoted monthly billing costs that make the service unfeasible. As a result, Chattanooga has remained a relative ghost town for technological innovation. Almost no economic development whatsoever has resulted from the gig,” the newspaper said.
The newspaper said what the government program has achieved is a “shocking price tag.”
“Because of your unwillingness to balance the budget, Mr. President, the $111.6 million federal handout to subsidize the Gig to Nowhere will actually cost federal taxpayers $158.2 million, due to interest. Once EPB received the stimulus infusion to fund the pork project, the electric monopoly took out a $219.8 bond that will balloon to $391.3 million by the time Chattanoogans are done paying it off.
“The bond’s first payment comes due this fall and there remain significant questions about how EPB can manage to pay the debt without hiking electric rates on EPB customers,” the newspaper said. “Building a Smart Grid to get into a telecom sector already well-served by private companies was a bad idea from the start. But getting government involved in places it doesn’t belong is a hallmark of your administration.”
Obama’s explained his newest strategy is a plan that “simplifies the tax code for our businesses and creates good jobs with good wages.”
He said he would be willing to tax code reform – but only if it allows the government “to use money from transitioning to a simpler tax system for a significant investment in creating middle-class jobs.”


Rolling In The Deep… With Communists

by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

I honestly don’t know how anyone who has been paying even the slightest attention to Obama and his history can be surprised at President Barack Obama‘s claim that Vietnam’s communist leader Ho Chi Minh was an admirer of U.S. Founding Father, Thomas Jefferson. Obama’s hochiminhstatement should be one for the history books and it is a direct insult to our Vietnam Vets. Disgraceful.

After all, Obama just claimed that
he knows more about the Constitution than those stupid, oafish Republicans. So, now he’s all knowing, as well as all seeing — hope Olympus has saved him a seat:
In an interview after his speech Wednesday in Galesburg, Illinois, President Obama was asked if he consulted White House lawyers before unilaterally delaying the employer mandate in Obamacare. Since Congress, in the Affordable Care Act, specified that the mandate is go to into effect at the start of next year, reporters from the New York Times asked if the president investigated whether he had the legal authority to put it off without going through Congress.

Obama didn’t exactly answer the question. But judging from what he said, his answer was: No, I didn’t consult White House lawyers because I know a lot more about the Constitution than the Republicans who are complaining about it. And besides, they don’t think I’m legitimately the president, anyway.

“People questioned your legal and constitutional authority to do that unilaterally — to delay the employer mandate,” asked the Times’ Jackie Calmes. “Did you consult with your lawyer?” [...]

At that point, Obama explained that if Congress doesn’t like what he’s done, then lawmakers can try to do something about it. “I’m not concerned about their opinions,” the president said. “Very few of them, by the way, are lawyers, much less constitutional lawyers.” And some Republicans “think I usurp my authority by having the gall to win the presidency.” [emphasis mine]
At a July 25th meeting with Vietnam’s current communist Premier, Truong Tan Sang, Obama said:
At the conclusion of the meeting, President Sang shared with me a copy of a letter sent by Ho Chi Minh to Harry Truman. And we discussed the fact that Ho Chi Minh was actually inspired by the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and the words of Thomas Jefferson. Ho Chi Minh talks about his interest in cooperation with the United States. And President Sang indicated that even if it’s 67 years later, it’s good that we’re still making progress.
Perhaps Obama missed that Ho Chi Minh had been a communist operative for more than 20 years at the time of that letter. That he spent most of his life living outside his country and that some of that time was in Moscow studying in the Lenin School. With the military aid of America, the Vietnamese communist guerrillas had just finished expelling the Japanese invaders. Ho Chi Minh was on very close terms with the U.S, Office of Strategic Services (already heavily infiltrated by American communists), which was the forerunner of the CIA.
Per Trevor Loudon:
The Vietnamese communist’s next step was to expel the French colonialists. They were keen to enlist American help in this battle, or at least not to provoke US opposition. In 1945, US foreign policy was still very soft on communism. It would only harden under Democrat president Harry Truman a couple of years later. Imagine what today’s Democrats would think of Truman – or JFK for that matter.
Ho Chi Minh had a brilliant mind and he played America like a communist fiddle. He lied with aplomb to gain support against the French and when that didn’t work with the Americans (at first), he turned to the Russians and ousted them by 1954.
Up is down, black is white and history has now been turned inside out. It’s like America is stuck in a never ending game of Lucy and Charlie Brown football. We keep falling for the same old communist tricks, because they swear it’s different this time. The Vietnam War was more of the same and so are today’s trends:
Then, after a period of consolidation, this great admirer of Thomas Jefferson attacked sovereign South Vietnam, with covert Soviet and Chinese support, sparking the Vietnam War.
The communists played a similar game in China, deliberately portraying themselves (with the help of American sympathizers in the State Department) as non-communist “agrarian reformers.”
Fidel Castro played similar games in pre-revolutionary Cuba.
Hugo Chavez in Venezuela repeatedly denied he was a socialist – until he had consolidated sufficient power.
I would suggest that a protege of Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis and a long time “Party friend” like Barack Obama, would be well aware of the history behind his statements.
The Devil can cite Scriptures to suit his purpose. Communists have a long history of citing the US Constitution and invoking American patriotism to suit theirs.
Barack Obama does it regularly…
Ho Chi Minh was The Butcher of North Vietnam and he is the recipient of high praise from Barack Obama. Obama is rewriting history to suit his Marxist vision. Make no mistake that Obama knew exactly what he was saying and whom he was praising.
While China is gearing up for war with us and paying very special attention to radiation-hardened electronics (gee, I wonder why), Obama is kanoodling with communists, Marxists, religious radicals and dictators across the planet. He has left us wide open to attack by seriously downsizing our military and gutting our weapon arsenals. He wants us attacked and brought down. It would be the ultimate redistribution of wealth and would give Obama the accomplishment of his long-dreamed of agenda.
Obama’s meeting with Vietnamese President Truong Tan Sang was a slap in America’s face — it was the ultimate bow and grovel moment. This is a country that on a regular basis imprisons and tortures bloggers and priests, quashes reporting and free speech, and routinely silences any form of political dissent. They are also heavily into forced labor and slavery. Obama said they “discussed the challenges that all of us face when it comes to issues of human rights.” You betcha! I’ll wager Obama was taking notes on how to improve his flowering dictatorship. Michelle Obama told supporters in her latest email that Barack is working to make Americans free from government. Yes, free from our form of government so Obama can rule as he wishes from on high. And that is at the core of his bromance with Ho Chi Minh, with Mao, with Stalin, with Che and with every other blood thirsty communist/Marxist/progressive that has unfortunately graced history. Note that “freedom from government” is the anarchist/chaos stage used to catapult dictators to power.
From a 1968 Reader’s Digest piece on the rule of Ho Chi Minh:
The village chief and his wife were distraught. One of their children, a seven-year-old boy, had been missing for four days. They were terrified, they explained to Marine Lt. Gen. Lewis W. Walt, because they believed he had been captured by the Vietcong.
Suddenly, the boy came out of the jungle and ran across the rice paddies toward the village. He was crying. His mother ran to him and swept him up in her arms. Both of his hands had been cut off, and there was a sign around his neck, a message to his father: if he or any one else in the village dared go to the polls during the upcoming elections, something worse would happen to the rest of his children.
Bloodbath Discipline.
The terror had its real beginning when Red dictator Ho Chi Minh consolidated his power in the North. More than a year before his 1954 victory over the French, he launched a savage campaign against his own people. In virtually every North Vietnamese village, strong-arm squads assembled the populace to witness the “confessions” of landowners. As time went on, businessmen, intellectuals, school teachers, civic leaders — all who represented a potential source of future opposition — were also rounded up and forced to “confess” to “errors of thought.” There followed public “trials,” conviction and, in many cases, execution. People were shot, beheaded, beaten to death; some were tied up, thrown into open graves and covered with stones until they were crushed to death, Ho has renewed his terror in North Vietnam periodically. Between 50,000 and 100,000 are believed to have died in these blood-baths — in a coldly calculated effort to discipline the party and the masses. To be sure, few who escape Ho’s terror now seem likely to tempt his wrath. During the 1950s, however, he had to quell some sizeable uprisings in North Vietnam — most notably one that occurred in early November 1956, in the An province, which included Ho’s birthplace village of Nam Dan. So heavily had he taxed the region that the inhabitants finally banded together and refused to meet his price. Ho sent troops to collect, and then sent in an army division, shooting. About 6,000 unarmed villagers were killed. The survivors scattered, some escaping to the South. The slaughter went largely unnoticed by a world then preoccupied with the Soviet Union’s rape of Hungary.
Sounds like Obama and “Uncle Ho” are similar in many ways. He seems to be rolling in the deep with his beloved communists. I am very sure he is familiar with the Cambodian Killing Fields as part of Ho Chi Minh’s grand plan. I wonder… is it part of Obama’s? I’ll leave you with a candid quote from Fox News:
It may come as some unwelcome news to the families of the nearly 60,000 Americans who died in the Vietnam War that the whole thing was just a misunderstanding.


The Time Has Come To March For Liberty...!!!


by Eliana Benador

“Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.” Thomas Jefferson

“In commenting on the resistance he experienced to his own unorthodox views on health, Yale surgeon Dr. Bernie S. Siegel, author of the best-selling book “Love, Medicine, and Miracles,” asserts that it is because people are addicted to their beliefs.  Siegel says this is why when you try to change someone’s belief they act like an addict.

There seems to be a good deal of truth to Siegel’s observation, which perhaps is why so many of civilization’s greatest insights, and advances have at first been greeted with such passionate denial.  We are addicted to our beliefs and we *do* act like addicts when someone tries to wrest from us the powerful opium of our dogmas.”  Michael Talbot

”If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?”  Pirke Avot / Ethics of the Fathers 1:14

“United we stand; divided we fall”

I dedicate this article to my son and to future generations of innocent Americans whose voice cannot be heard but who will inherit the decision this generation of Americans will make.  Eliana Benador
Benador BannerAbroad, one can feel the influence America has had and still has in the world.  Whether it is the wide array of American hotel chains or Starbucks, Gap, including the decadent rap music; and one can be surprised by the incredible attention a Swiss newspaper gives, of all people, to someone like Kim Kardashian and her choice of her daughter’s name.  That is how influential America is, for better or for worse, in the everyday life of billions and billions around the planet.

Meanwhile, in mainland, Americans who have throughout the years gotten used to live a life of comfort, slowly became more inclined to worry about the outer world by sending their sons and daughters in military uniform, resigned to give their lives for causes in faraway countries, whose name sometimes American-English speakers cannot even pronounce them.

In other words, Americans have fought tyrannies, but never lived them.  Thus, under such circumstances, they overlook the embryos that are evolving in their midst and are prone to ignore the signs of tyranny that are about to push their doors down.
After a first term, a majority of the American people renewed Mr. Obama’s lease to the White House, but the love affair between the American democrats and their president has not fair well for the conservative minority who were not willing to elect him or his anti-American agenda, but were factually unable to stop the democratic tsunami.  


For over a century now, liberals have understood that they must destroy the family nucleus if they want not only to takeover a country, but to control it completely and turn it into a socialist entity at least, or communist at worst.
For that, they knew that the first goal was to promote feminism, in the name of so-called equal rights for women. Abortion followed, as did the legalization of homosexual marriage, and the subsequent total overhaul of sexual values.  As follow-up, in Chicago they have programmed a course to teach kindergartners “one can marry anyone,” thus proving how unnatural their policies and positions are.


Obama ran as the “black” candidate thus setting the tone of his behavior throughout his terms.  He was quick to run to Florida when a white American Latino killed a black man in self-defense.  “Trayvon could have been my son,” was his heavy loaded message. “Trayvon could have been me,” he said, when he failed to manipulate the jurors whose verdict innocent the accused.
As a matter of fact, “A division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) was deployed to Sanford, Florida in 2012 to provide assistance for anti-George Zimmerman protests, including a rally headlined by activist Al Sharpton, according to newly released documents.”
Zimmermann’s parents went in hiding due to threats they received, and when Zimmermann helped take some people out of their accident car, that family instead of being thankful to him, they cancelled a TV appearance out of fear.
Recently, Larry Elder went off on Piers Morgan during an explosive race debate:  “You’re making black people feel as if they are under siege... It’s an outrage!”  He went on to say: “...that there were 7,000 murders last year of black people, almost all of which were committed by blacks. “
There are real problems within the black community in America.  If Barack Obama really cared about them, he could have rather focused on fixing a real problem, such as the murders on black people, of which 93% are perpetrated by blacks.  
What Obama wants to promote and advance, is his agenda, he is obviously pushing for unrest to indirectly maybe cause a beginning of a civil war so he and his people can have the excuse they need to impose martial law and takeover America.


From the beginning of his presidency, Obama marked the tone instructing Charles Bolden,  the head of NASA, to do Muslim Outreach in order to make Muslims “feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering...”  And, Bolden gives parallel cases, so to say, of countries who have made major intellectual and scientific contributions, such as Russia and Japan...   As such, the president relegated the advancement of American space science to favor his friends, but that was only the first of his first ‘open house’ to welcome his Muslim partners.
Not enough has been said in the media about this:
The trial of U.S. Army major Nidal Hassan finally began on July 9th, four years after he carried out an Islamic terror attack that he is actually continuing. That is largely because he is representing himself at his trial, apparently so he can further publicize his belief that he was acting to defend Islam. In response, the U.S. government continues to insist that the Hasan attack had nothing to do with religion but was simply a case of workplace violence. Many of the 32 surviving victims of the 2009 attack in Ft. Hood are complaining, without success, that they are receiving less attention (and money) for their injuries because they did not get a Purple Heart medal because of the incident. The Purple Heart medal is the U.S. military award for combat wounds and it entitles soldiers to higher compensation and more prompt medical attention. The decision not to award Purple Hearts to the Ft. Hood victims is at the center of a controversy between politicians who are trying to play down the presence of Islamic radicalism in the United States and military leaders who want recognition for American troops killed or wounded by Islamic terrorism. While victims of domestic terrorism can receive the Purple Heart, the U.S. government has several times refused to categorize the November 5, 2009 attack in Ft. Hood as a terrorist action. It is expected that this will become even more difficult to defend as the Hasan trial proceeds.”
The Nidal Malik Hassan case is the most infamous among Islam and Muslim-related abuses from the Obama Administration, committed so far, with total impunity, but it is far from being the last one.
It was during president Hosni Mubarak’s time that Obama gave his 2009 Cairo speech and the result was dramatic: Muslim Brotherhood got the green light and in time, removed the dictator who nevertheless had been an American ally for years.  Such move initiated a row of dark moves by the Brothers throughout the Muslim Middle East, where the world benevolently has watched the rise of terrorists keen to push their sharia agenda.
There is a litany of examples of the infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood members within the administration, facilitated by Barack Obama, who has legitimized their presence.  Muslim Brotherhood is the Egyptian organization for the advancement of Islam and its Jihad for Muslim world domination happens via its tool of choice: terrorism in its various nasty shapes and forms.
We would be remiss if we did not mention the other Muslim style of invasion, one that is even more aggressive than violence. Liberal governments worldwide are intent in facilitating Muslim immigration, which will result in a demographic explosion in America, Europe and the West in general, given that their birth rate is among the highest on the planet.
With so many children per family, Muslims are now receiving government aid of all sorts, in America, but also in Europe, Australia and other countries.  It is not surprising that in Michigan, for instance, the city of Detroit has become the first case of a city bankruptcy in 21st century America. 

Some consider Michigan the “Islamic capital of the United States,” due to the heavy Muslim presence throughout its cities.  The situation in Detroit is dramatic.  The city is basically been taken over by Muslims who may well have driven the city to the place where it is now.  Dearborn, another predominantly Muslim city, is enclaved in Detroit on three borders.  Sharia is being imposed there.  

All this is happening silently, while Americans are been asked to abort their children and have no jobs.
To those who will want to accuse me of Islamophobe, I say:
I have been in your countries and know for a fact that you do not even accept a synagogue or a church.  So, do not be surprised that we cannot and will not accept that you take over our civilization, our country and our lives.


Last September 11, in another masterful but tragically successful Islamist move, Muslim terrorists attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya and caught Ambassador Stevens.  Now we know that the Obama Administration gave orders NOT to send any help to save the Ambassador, who left to be murdered by terrorists who also murdered the security, former navy seals Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, as well as a computer expert Sean Smith.  All that, while Obama and his Secretary of State and staff were watching from their plush offices in the White House.
In order to secure their positions, the Obama Administration have gone much further:  Recently, the Benghazi survivors have had to sign a nondisclosure agreement that forbids them to testify, even in case of subpoena.  Some in Congress are reacting.
Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., is calling on the Obama administration to explain why the survivors of last year's deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya, were reportedly asked to sign non-disclosure agreements that prevent them from talking about the attack.
On July 22nd, Senator Rand Paul via his Twitter handle @SenRandPaul asked: Ambassador Stephens pleaded for more security before the attacks yet the marines were ordered to stand down.  Who made that order?
The fact that Rand Paul is making his questions via Twitter shows Congress impotency vis-à-vis a rogue president and his deceptive administration.


Reviewing the immigration bill one can find buried in the text that “hidden multimillion-dollar slush funds for left-wing nonprofit groups to provide services to the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants now in the U.S. Once enacted, the slush funds would total almost $300 million over three years and grow over time....   it's obvious that lawyering would be needed. The 1,100-page proposal is a network of legal requirements and protections, waivers and exceptions, including a new "provisional immigrant" status (the first phase of legalization for illegals), appeals of adverse rulings, stays of deportation, applications for work visas, and countless other such guarantees... Within this thicket of new rights are features that would vastly increase the flow of immigrants to perhaps 30 million or 40 million over the next decade. One is a set of "chain immigration" clauses, legalizing the spouses and children of illegals.
Influential Congresswoman Michele Bachmann has already warned that Obama “will unilaterally give voting rights to non-citizens after immigration law passes... because we’ve seen this president just make law by virtue of a press conference or standing in front of a microphone.
That said, if Obama signs the bill over the summer recess, the heavily distressed population of 102 million unemployed and 12 million jobless Americans -many among them may have undoubtedly voted for him- will have a certain future with not a glimmer of a hope of ever getting a job, with all that implies for them and their families for many generations to come.
Regarding American values, they will simply be gone and lost if Obama has his way and brings in his immigrant mercenaries, whom, as Congresswoman Bachmann says he will soon enough make sure to give vote rights.
Instead of establishing programs to promote American birth rate, the Obama administration’s first concern is to secure a democratic rule for at least the next century.
One thing is sure, if unemployed and jobless Americans had no jobs until now, the chances that they will ever get one will go below zero once the immigration bill is passed by this president.


Brits are having a field day.  A new book “Presidential Perks gone Royal” by author Richard Gray, and which sheds light on the Obama's family cost to the nation last year alone:  U.S. taxpayers have paid the Obamas a whopping $1.4 billion.  That is 20 times more than the royal family which .merely cost the U.K., $57.8 million.  Obama's expenditures include the salaries of his staff and Secret Service, plus doctors, as well as Bo, his dog and acronym, and his doggy-nanny at a rate of over 100,000 per year.  Those expenses also include the maintenance of Air Force One, which presidents must take and which he has used and abused for his personal campaign purposes last year.
True... “... the system should be reformed to stop the amount of unquestioned perks given to the president.
Given that the current number of taxpayers is approximately 216 million, it means that each must contribute $6.48 for the First Family over-the-board indulging.


Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war.
In the case of Libya, the president had no congressional authority whatsoever,” says Bruce Fein a notorious expert in Constitutional law, “The whole thing is insane. And the executive doesn’t care because all the time that conflict ensues, that just means more executive power. That’s exactly what the Founding Fathers feared...”  “President Obama just totally flouted the whole thing and basically said through his various memos, ‘I don’t need congressional authority to go to war.’ That was clearly an impeachable offense. It’s clearly gross usurpation of the war power.  Both the Republicans and Democrats have acquiesced in that.”  
Herbert Titus, another well-known lawyer specialized in Constitutional law considers that, “If you’re going to talk impeachment, you have to find something that Obama has done that is so distinctly different than what other presidents have done before him that people can resonate with it. The difficult, of course, is that people have forgotten about Libya.”
For two years now, Obama is intent in “helping” depose president Assad, the ‘known’ of two evils but nevertheless a former ally.  Now it seems that he has made another step as he has begun arming the terrorists who are intent in removing the president.  In this case, even Russia is in disagreement with the American president.


Back in May 2011, as Obama announced ‘his’ victory in catching Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan, the president unhesitatingly gave away highly classified information as he proudly announced the capture and death of America’s arch-enemy.  Thus, the authors of the extraordinary feat were uncovered by their own president and gone was the protective secrecy that surrounded their existence as the special warfare elite group within the Navy Seals:  Team six.
Barely three months later, 23 real men of the same Seal Team Six, flew to their death in highly questionable circumstances:  Instead of leaving on their usual state-of-the-art helicopter, at the last minute they took to an old Chinook, which the whole team boarded together.  The Afghan team accompanying  them was pulled out at the last minute.  As they arrived to the destination, they were murdered -their usual back up team was not in tow.
How did the Taliban know how they were going to fly, when they were going to fly, what precise time they were going to fly?  Undoubtedly, the responsibility comes from high above.
So were murdered 23 highly trained, highly specialized operatives from the elite Navy Seal Team Six, ambushed in a trap that now the American tyranny is desperate to cover up.
Once again, Obama and his administration continue eliminating, in one way or another, the real men in our military who have gone through sweat and tears to defend the country.  Meanwhile, the president got rid of the DADT policy.
And, so, more widows and widowers, orphans and children, continue losing their loved ones who sacrificed all to keep you and I safe.  
May their deaths not be in vain.


Obama was elected by a democratic majority.  
Whether republicans or democrats, Americans at large are being an increasing part of the 102 million unemployed and the 12 million  jobless, and one must add to the equation as well,  their affected families and children.
Given that this president’s agenda has twisted priorities, democrats and republicans unemployed and jobless know that job creation is far from the top of his list.  He rather stresses the “widening income inequality,” rather than concentrate in job creation, stop outsourcing and stopping his greatly damaging immigration bill that will stab in the back our working class.
Unavoidably, this situation will result in 4 out of 5 Americans will face near-poverty and have no jobs under Obama.  An excerpt of a NewsMax report:
“Survey data exclusive to The Associated Press point to an increasingly globalized U.S. economy, the widening gap between rich and poor, and the loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs as reasons for the trend...  “There is the real possibility that white alienation will increase if steps are not taken to highlight and address inequality on a broad front," Wilson said....  Nationwide, the count of America's poor remains stuck at a record number: 46.2 million, or 15 percent of the population, due in part to lingering high unemployment following the recession. While poverty rates for blacks and Hispanics are nearly three times higher, by absolute numbers the predominant face of the poor is white.
More than 19 million whites fall below the poverty line of $23,021 for a family of four, accounting for more than 41 percent of the nation's destitute, nearly double the number of poor blacks....  Sometimes termed "the invisible poor" by demographers, lower-income whites generally are dispersed in suburbs as well as small rural towns, where more than 60 percent of the poor are white.”
Sadly, an increasingly high teenage joblessness adds complexity to the problem.  “Two hundred and fifty thousand jobs rolled out across the country with public funds through the federal stimulus for 16- to 19-year-olds. In that same context, the labor market for 16- to 19-year-olds had shed 2 to 3 million jobs. It's like (Mount St. Helens); you're blowing off the top of the mountain. You know, suddenly the geography of the labor market changed and 16- to 19-year-olds fell out of the equation.”  
This nasty trend has pulled the rug from under the feet of our teenagers who used to get jobs at their tender age. Now, their future is in limbo as well.


In yet another one of his disgraceful tirades, two days ago, Barack Obama disrespected the seriousness of Americans tribulations caused by him:, such as Obamacare, his attacks on DOMA, the overhauling of DADT, from Fast and Furious to the NSA and the IRS, from Solyndra to attacks on the Second Amendment, Free Speech and Religious Freedom, and many more.  
By calling them “phony scandals” Mr. Obama wants once again to manipulate whoever is still believing in him and most certainly he can count on mainstream media, to continue hammering his sickening position with whoever is left within his ranks that still believes in him and his anti-American agenda.  


Constitutional scholar Herbert Titus explains:  “One of the problems with impeaching President Obama is that much of what he’s doing, he’s doing because Congress has allowed it or authorized it. So Congress is not in a position to review Obama’s actions and, in the House, to charge him with a high crime and misdemeanor. It’s very difficult.
Congress looked on mute when the president crossed the line and illegally began the war against Libya, thus indirectly preparing the terrain for the Benghazi tragic episode. Though representatives of the people, many times they seem aloof to the interests of those who have elected them.
As a matter of fact, a new national poll has found that an all-time high of 57% of Americans would vote to throw out every member of Congress if given the option in the 2014 elections.


History shows us a few examples of aborted impeachment procedures.
President Andrew Johnson was impeached by the House of Representatives for violating the Terms of Office Act during the 1860s.  For his part, President Bill Clinton was also impeached by the House of Representatives for lying in regards to the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
In hindsight, however, those cases appear so mild compared to the present one.
That said, neither Johnson nor Clinton were removed from office as there was no Senate majority necessary to boot either of them out.
As for President, Nixon, he would have been impeached and probably even removed from office, but he simply resigned before tempting his luck.
It is questionable if the current Congress would impeach Obama, but it is sure the democratic majority in the Senate would fail to finish the job.


Unfortunately, the above list is by no means exhaustive. But it has been done in an effort to show in one place how current America’s horizon looks like.
The fact that Egypt’s president Morsi  has been deposed by the military of his country on the eve of  this year’s American Independence Day, came as an omen for the American people, who need to be inspired and gather the necessary strength to defend their Constitution and their country.
The anti-Americanism of this president and his repeated violations of the American Constitution, are setting the path for the establishment of tyranny on American soil.  They are constantly purging the kind of information to be kept in official archives to fit their interests and hide or distort the truth, adulterating History forever.
The constant attacks on the American Constitution, with total impunity, and the increasing intrusion in the private lives of Americans, cannot continue.


It is time that Americans wake up, stop the nightmare and bring the American Dream back to their hearts and their lives as well as to the lives of their children, their children’s children and the generations to come.
It is time that the American people march peacefully, by the millions, from all corners of America to Washington, D.C. and, as one man, stand in front of the White House and Congress, until they have all surrendered power.
Obama, his administration, Congress, all of must go.  And a transitional power must be set to facilitate immediate early elections.
The entirety of the government must be prosecuted and Justice must be served.
The agenda could include abolishing the IRS.  Americans do not need to pay three kinds of taxes.  Representing the generation of young professionals, Gabriel Benador has proposed that “The country should be governed as a gigantic business.”  The IRS is gargantuan and its power have gone overboard.  They must be replaced by states tax entities. Only one small central organization should suffice for a minimum national “allegiance tax.”  This is naturally to be developed by professional economists.  
The Supreme Court should be replaced by a potentially unbiased set of pro-American, pro-Constitution judges with different backgrounds, as soon as possible.  
There should be a total cleansing of needless government agencies and the media, and those who survive should have the least personnel possible.
Regarding the defense of the traditional American family, a totally revolutionary and avant-garde initiative: It is time to promote the concept of paying a salary to mothers who work at home. From experience, women know that a stay at home mother probably works 5 times more than any lady working at the office. And, you can add two times more for each added children. Mothers do not need to leave home to help with family finances. They already do so when they work at home, as no one can replace the job she does with her children.
It is imperative to reinforce values of G-d, patriotism and family.  And that should be reflected in an overhaul of the education system.
Overturning Obamacare is a must.
The immigration bill must be aborted, Americans demographics must receive a stimulus to national birth rate, and a bonus for each American child should be established.  


Seems that community organization has been successful, so it could be a tool to get started in a serious way.  No social networking can be used to ‘organize’ the march.  However, the coordination could well use Twitter and/or Facebook.
That said, another possibility is to spontaneously begin by one courageous town and others will follow.  The sociological path to change is based on the “match-effect.”  Once you light the match, the rest will follow.  
Many organized groups, including the military and others, will certainly follow inspired by seeing how the people are united behind Country and the American Constitution.  
Then, all will know where their allegiance is.


My readers may be expecting a date.  What about Labor Day 2013?  
To those who have qualms, here an important question:
What is unconstitutional:
A president and government that increasingly violate the Constitution, with total impunity?
Those who defend that Constitution from being viciously violated, with absolute impunity, especially when all indicates the enemy might at one point declare it obsolete?
A peaceful march of millions of Americans towards Washington D.C., will set the tone and send the message also to the world, that the American people will no longer put up with attacks against the Constitution and their Rights.
If the trend continues unstopped, it is easy to see that 2016 instead of looking like a year of hope, will rather seal the end of the American Dream.
Fear nothing.  As Thomas Jefferson said: “Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.”
And, if you must fear something, then fear to death doing nothing.  


Americans must choose to do this, for themselves but also for the many generations who will inherit the courage of their actions or the cowardice that stopped them.