COMMENTARY breaking news top stories world news politics headlines conservative news liberal news fox news fake news economic news socio political government news updates political blogs editorials illegal immigrant racism terrorism Trump Obama Clinton Mueller investigation dossier Russia China Congress scandal Sessions FBI NSA CIA intelligence science news election news worldwide news sociopolitical journal invasion midterm migrants
theodore M I R A L D I mpa ... editor, publisher, writer
Friday, February 3, 2017
When the TRUTH is ‘Twisted by Knaves’
President Trump is paying the price of a policy badly executed Suzanne Fields
It’s hard to “keep your head when all about you are losing theirs,” as Rudyard Kipling reminded us in his poem of simple homilies that every school child once put to memory. It’s all about holding your own counsel, thinking hard, using your brain, and keeping your cool when bombarded with the fashions and whims of others. Kipling, a Nobel laureate of the late 19th century, was banished from the modern canon, naturally, as terminally politically incorrect.
The poem, “If,” counsels aiming for truth even when it’s “twisted by knaves,” and the plentiful knaves abroad today not only believe they have a monopoly on the truth, but are good and pure of heart and entitled to impose their “truth” on everyone else.
That’s how and why the opponents of Donald Trump twisted his executive order that temporarily bars new immigrants and certain travelers from seven Middle Eastern countries identified earlier (by Barack Obama) as likely sources of terrorists. The knaves are clearly bent on preventing reasonable discussion of what and why he’s doing what he promised to do. Few of us could stand seeing some of our own remarks snatched from context. The president is especially vulnerable because of his fondness for hyperbole.
It’s necessary to argue with reason and attention to facts because it’s the only way to have an honest debate about how to keep America safe in the age of terrorism. Characterizing the president, as one prominent journalist did, as “deranged,” cheapens conversation and ignores the rational reasons that led to his decision to prescribe “extreme vetting” on refugees from the seven countries identified by the Obama administration as breeding grounds for terrorists.
Otherwise sad stories drive the debate, about families with visas trying to unite, women and children marooned at airports, and men and women who translated and spied for our side in dangerous places devoid of personal security. Such poignant stories overwhelm the emotions and smother legitimate discussion about how to prevent terrorism among us. The legitimate exceptions to the order, such as holders of green cards previously extremely vetted, were exempted only after the order sowed anger and confusion.
The president, who depended on the counsel of those of suspect competence, was betrayed as a novice in leadership. Raucous other voices, some of them bordering on hysteria, make rational argument difficult. Every new president has to learn, sometimes the hard way, that process — how he goes about doing things — is as important as substance. It determines what he can accomplish. The execution of the order was sloppy. That’s too bad because the president touched a nerve of Americans rightly in fear of terrorists who can come here under the cover of the thousands of innocent refugees deserving shelter. The fear is not irrational.
No matter what this president does, angry antagonists on the left will object, protest and make decent disagreement impossible. The actual facts of the president’s order have been submerged in invective and loose talk. The order does not bar Muslims. It does not apply to dozens of other Muslim-majority countries. Barack Obama used similar orders in 2011 to delay visas for refugees from Iraq for six months. The circumstances then were similar, but different. He was responding to a specific threat by two Iraqi refugees who were plotting to send money home to buy weapons and explosives for al Qaeda. The FBI later matched the fingerprints of one of the men with those lifted from an unexploded bomb discovered six years earlier in Iraq, calling the quality of his vetting process into doubt.
Prevention is often a hard sell, made difficult this time since no immigrant from any of the seven countries named in the order has been implicated in a terrorist attack in the United States. An executive order, albeit temporary, is a clumsy mechanism for enlisting public support for a sweeping new policy on immigrants. You don’t have to believe Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s tears are real, or applaud the protests at airports to see how the stories told by sob sisters of the media damage how America is perceived in the world. Such perceptions displayed on television and social media, like it or not, quickly become reality. This in turn damages the new president’s ability to accomplish reasonable and worthy goals.
Americans are polarized. Europeans are nervous (as usual). Our friends in the Middle East are troubled. Gen. Talib al Kenani, the Iraqi officer who directs American-trained counterterrorist forces against ISIS in Iraq, whose visit here was “delayed,” tells CBS News how his own children asked him if they’re considered terrorists now. Donald Trump, like presidents before him, learns to beware of well-meaning advice (and the flattery of courtiers). This execution of his executive order missed the mark by a mile, and he’s paying for it.