COMMENTARY breaking news top stories world news politics headlines conservative news liberal news fox news fake news economic news socio political government news updates political blogs editorials illegal immigrant racism terrorism Trump Obama Clinton Mueller investigation dossier Russia China Congress scandal Sessions FBI NSA CIA intelligence science news election news worldwide news sociopolitical journal invasion midterm migrants republicans democrats
theodore M I R A L D I mpa ... editor, publisher, writer
Monday, June 5, 2017
Climate Change HYPOCRITES
The European and Chinese leaders who scolded Trump violated the last climate treaty China Pollution Illustration by Greg Groesch Stephen Moore
Maybe the phoniest and most laughable reaction to President Donald Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord was the European and Chinese leaders who blasted Mr. Trump and America for “surrendering its world leadership” role. The sanctimonious leaders in Asia and European nations pledged to move full speed ahead on clean energy with or without the United States. Be my guest.
But we’ve been to this movie before. The Europeans were all in on the Kyoto Climate Change deal back in 2001 — an international treaty the U.S. rightly rejected. Euroland promised a massive shift to green energy and to abandon fossil fuels to dramatically reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. But guess what? The green energy revolution was a bust. None of these countries came close to meeting those targets. Now these nations, especially Germany, are moving away from the saintly clean energy sources.
Why would we believe them when they say they are now solemnly committed to a new treaty when they violated the last one?
Even more amazing and underreported is that the United States — even though we did not make a pledge to reduce our greenhouse gases in accord with that treaty — has reduced our carbon emissions more than the European signatories.
Contrary to the flood of insults directed at the Trump admininistration, the U.S. is not the bad actor on the world stage on environmental protection. We are the world leader in environmental stewardship and our energy use as a share of the economy continues to shrink.
An even more preposterous claim is that China and India — the two largest polluters by far — are moving away from fossil fuels and transitioning to wind and solar power.
No they are not. Here is what The Wall Street Journal reported in a November story about China and India “doubling down” on fossil fuel use: “China’s government said it would raise coal power capacity by as much as 20 percent by 2020, ensuring a continuing strong role for the commodity in the country’s energy sector despite a pledge to bring down pollution levels. In a new five-year plan for electricity released Monday, the National Energy Administration said it would raise coal-fired power capacity from around 900 gigawatts last year to as high as 1,100 gigawatts by 2020.”
In April a science industry newsletter headline read: “Japan, India, and China Still Turing to More Coal Throughout 2020s, Which means More co2 and Pollution.” The air quality today is filthy in Beijing and Shaghai as factories belch out black smoke and smog.
Wait. We are going to be lectured by these nations about saving the planet? This is like taking a lesson in personal hygiene from Pigpen (my favorite Peanuts character).
We should have learned by now that with foreign nations, you always have to watch what they do, not listen to what they say. China isn’t interested in reducing pollution levels. It is hyper-focused on one goal: gaining global dominance in every industry and using the cheapest and most reliable energy sources possible to get there. China and Europe want the U.S. to transition to more expensive energy sources in no small part so they can regain the competitiveness they lost due to green enrgy policies.
The press is also having a field day with the story that Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and Solar City, has resigned from a Trump economic advisory council out of protest. But Mr. Musk, according to the Los Angeles Times, has received almost $5 billion in government subsidies. Solar City and Tesla are likely out of business without all the taxpayer-funded green handouts. Why doesn’t the press report that Musk has a multi-billion dollar personal stake in global warming.
America has at least 200 years of shale gas, which is clean burning, efficient, and made in America. We have 500 years of coal, and the emissions of pollutants from coal plants have fallen by more than 50 percent in recent decades. Clean coal is here and rather than shutdown this industry and put tens of thousands more coal miners in unemployment lines, we should allow technology and innovation to make it cleaner still through gasification, carbon capture, and so on.
Because of stunning advances in drilling technologies, the value of American oil, gas and coal resources that are currently recoverable is estimated at near $50 trillion — which is more than double our national debt. The Paris Climate Accord would require America to keep this massive treasure chest of resources in the ground never to be used. Sadly, President Barack Obama negotiated a treaty that accommodated the economic interests of our rivals and put America last. Mr. Trump’s gutsy decision puts America on the path to becoming the global energy superpower in the decades to come and puts American workers first.