theodore M I R A L D I mpa ... editor, publisher, writer

Thursday, August 23, 2018

In Case You FORGOT! Congress Paid MILLIONS In HUSH Money to Protect POLITICIANS

"Secret settlements" paid by members of Congress to various accusers also "influenced" their elections.

Image result for Congressional Hush money

Keith Edwards

For all those Democrats and the MSM who are seeking to use Michael Cohen’s plea deal to implicate President Trump in the alleged crime confessed to by Cohen, don’t forget to use the precedent set by the highly respected institution we call the Congress of the United States of America when you make arguments that Donald Trump was trying to influence an election with a payment to silence his accusers.
The following is a list of articles from major news outlets with short excerpts; written about members of congress paying “secret settlements” for everything from sexual harassment to who knows what else – because we really don’t know “what else” they did - it’s a secret.
The secrecy, or can we say cover-up, is meant to protect the identity of the elected officials involved who need to silence their accusers. You know, just in case the information might become public and affect their position in congress or -- wait for it -- the outcome of their next election.
Sexual harassment fund exposes Congress
“Under Congressional Accountability Act, taxpayers pay for secret settlements. Where's the accountability?
When sexual harassers agree on confidential settlements with victims, at least the payments come out of the harassers' own pockets or from companies that choose to employ them.
But not, as the nation has learned this month, when the harasser serves in Congress. Then, taxpayers foot the bill. And the entire episode remains hidden.”
How Congress plays by different rules on sexual harassment and misconduct
“Congress makes its own rules about the handling of sexual complaints against members and staff, passing laws exempting it from practices that apply to other employers.
The result is a culture in which some lawmakers suspect harassment is rampant. Yet victims are unlikely to come forward, according to attorneys who represent them.”
Congress’ sexual harassment system, decoded
“It has all the makings of a serious scandal: more than $17 million in public money paid since 1997 to settle workplace disputes on Capitol Hill.”
But the reality of what critics lambaste as a sexual harassment “slush fund” is more complicated, like much about Congress’ policy for handling harassment complaints. The money covers all sorts of settlements, just not for sexual harassment, and some lawmakers cut their own side deals with accusers.”
Congress paid out $17 million in settlements. Here's why we know so little about that money.
“Two things have become painfully clear on Capitol Hill this week: Lawmakers and staffers say sexual harassment is "rampant" -- but even members of Congress have no idea just how widespread the problem is.
The controversial and sensitive issue has taken center stage in Congress this week, with female lawmakers making fresh allegations of sexual harassment against unnamed members who are currently in office, and the unveiling of a new bill on Wednesday to change how sexual harassment complaints are reported and resolved.
On Thursday, the Office of Compliance released additional information indicating that it has paid victims more than $17 million since its creation in the 1990s. That includes all settlements, not just related to sexual harassment, but also discrimination and other cases.”
Record sexual harassment settlement exposes byzantine congressional process
“Of all the secret deals cut on behalf of accused members of congress, the one that resulted in the largest settlement yet uncovered may be the most surprising. The details provide a window into a process so opaque, convoluted and confusing that even the accused congressman was left in the dark about exactly how and why his accuser ended up being paid $220,000 for her claim.
With new harassment accusations being revealed on a nearly daily basis in Congress, documents obtained by NBC News from this one case shed light on how taxpayer money ends up being used to essentially sweep such incidents under a bureaucratic rug with little accountability.”
Congress details some payouts to sexual harassment accusers
“The Congressional office that has been using taxpayer funds to secretly settle cases of sexual harassment on Capitol Hill lifted the veil on a sliver of data today, showing that between 2008 and 2012 it paid out $115,000 to staffers who had filed workplace sexual harassment complaints while employed by a member of the House of Representatives.”
Rep says Congress paid out $15M to silence sex harassment victims
“Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) told MSNBC that the millions have been doled out to alleged victims of harassment from congressional members over the past decade.
The US congresswoman who testified that current members of Congress are known sex harassers said Tuesday night that $15 million in hush money has been paid to accusers.”
Why Are Congressmen Using Taxpayer Funds to Buy Off Sex Abuse Claims?
“Staffers who are the targets of unwanted sexual advances on Capitol Hill should not have to endure a lengthy mediation process and pay the legal bills as lawmakers secretly draw on a mysterious slush fund to settle the accusations against them, an advocate for taxpayers argues.
In the event of a monetary settlement of sexual harassment complaints, members of Congress can draw on a taxpayer-funded account set up within the Treasury Department to cover their legal expenses and settle cases.
The account has paid out $17 million in the past 10 years, public records show, although it is not clear how much of that was for cases of sexual harassment.”
Congress Has A Sexual Harassment Problem
“After weeks of stories detailing dozens of such sexual harassment incidents on Capitol Hill ― most involving unnamed lawmakers ― two things are clear: Congress has an abuse problem, and Congress is not sufficiently dealing with it.”
Congressional watchdog demands names in $17M sex harassment payoffs
“Frustrated with congressional stonewalling, an ethics watchdog group is going public with its demand that the list of lawmakers tied to $17 million in tax dollars used to pay off sexual harassment claims be released.
“The public deserves to know,” said the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, or FACT.
Congress’ Office of Compliance has paid out $17 million in harassment cases and kept the names of members involved secret. Two current female members said that there are two sitting lawmakers involved.”


  1. Anonymous1:28 AM EDT

    Howdy! This article couldn't be written much better!
    Reading through this post reminds me of my previous
    roommate! He continually kept preaching about this.
    I'll forward this article to him. Pretty sure he's going to have a good read.
    Many thanks for sharing!

  2. Anonymous5:34 AM EDT

    Keep on writing, great job!

  3. Anonymous9:12 AM EDT

    Keep on writing, great job!

  4. Anonymous3:25 PM EDT

    What's up, after reading this remarkable post i am too glad to share my know-how here with friends.

  5. Anonymous3:53 PM EDT

    Awesome article.

  6. Anonymous5:05 PM EDT

    Whats up very nice site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Wonderful
    .. I'll bookmark your website and take the feeds also?
    I am satisfied to seek out a lot of helpful information right here within the post, we need work out more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing.
    . . . . .

  7. Anonymous7:48 PM EDT

    That is a good tip particularly to those fresh to the blogosphere.
    Simple but very precise information... Many thanks for sharing this one.
    A must read article!

  8. Anonymous12:49 AM EDT

    I hardly leave a response, but i did a few searching and wound up here "In Case You FORGOT! Congress Paid MILLIONS In HUSH Money to Protect POLITICIANS".
    And I actually do have some questions for you if you
    tend not to mind. Is it simply me or does it look
    like some of these comments appear as if they are written by
    brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are writing on additional sites, I would like to keep up with anything
    new you have to post. Could you make a list of the complete urls of
    all your communal pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?

  9. Anonymous4:28 AM EDT

    I would like to use the opportunity of saying thanks to you
    for that professional direction I have usually enjoyed browsing
    your site. I am looking forward to the commencement of my college
    research and the whole preparing would never have been complete without browsing your blog.
    If I might be of any assistance to others, I'd personally be thankful to help
    by what I have learned from here.

  10. Anonymous8:38 AM EDT

    I as well conceive therefore, perfectly composed post!

  11. Anonymous7:41 PM EDT

    I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.
    I do not know who you are but definitely you are going
    to a famous blogger if you aren't already ;) Cheers!

  12. Anonymous8:52 PM EDT

    You have brought up a very fantastic points, regards
    for the post.

  13. Anonymous9:29 PM EDT

    I'd been honored to obtain a call coming from a friend when he found the important ideas shared on the site.
    Reading through your blog article is a real great experience.
    Thanks again for considering readers much like me, and I wish you the
    best of achievements for a professional in this field.

  14. Anonymous9:46 PM EDT

    You completed several fine points there. I did a search on the topic and found
    most persons will agree with your blog.

  15. Anonymous12:25 PM EDT

    Somebody necessarily help to make seriously articles I might
    state. That is the first time I frequented your web
    page and to this point? I surprised with the research you
    made to create this particular publish incredible.

    Wonderful job!

  16. Anonymous1:21 AM EDT

    Thanks , I've recently been searching for info approximately this subject for a while and yours is the greatest
    I have found out till now. But, what concerning the conclusion? Are you
    sure in regards to the supply?